At 14:00 he talks about the problem of compounding errors and how you can get in a bad state that you can't recover from. The solve is to use link not tracked to be able to snapshot the memory of a process at a known good state and then try 10 hypothetical changes, then you rely on things like link not trackeds, etc. to determine which ones are the best and you establish a link not tracked to decide what should become the new base to fork from x link not tracked link not tracked
...
This also reminds be of link not tracked approaches to reasoning using the link not tracked methods. Basically link not tracked link not tracked then winnowing things down by link not tracked. The difference here is that these seem to be short-term hypotheses and link not tracked with the aim of getting to some new link not tracked link not tracked, then link not tracked off of that to go further. That feels a little like link not tracked. This is all to avoid the compounding error (AKA error accumulation), which is particularly important because of dim - reliability -- low and a lack of revisiting link not tracked. LLMs doing link not tracked link not tracked tend to have link not tracked and link not tracked, which causes the errors to get worse over time.