agentic engineering scorecard→video - Github researcher on how we should collaborate with agents in teams - 2026-04→agent task -- change review app

agent task -- change review app

agent task -- change review app

When an agent task makes some substantive change after being triggered then it may need to ultimately be reviewed by a person.

Backlinks

dark insight factory

Bigger changes (multi-file) that impact existing files can be kicked off as parallel agents with the same kind of agent task -- change review apps as for code, but optimized for documentation change. The type of organization I did for things like Glossary would fit in here.

see in context

These could be agent task -- trigger type -- cron and just continuously making suggestions in parallel agents that can be reviewed in agent task -- change review apps and easily accepted or denied. (Those "change review packets" could just be stuff in the UI... the user doesn't have to be aware of the workings)

see in context
video - Github researcher on how we should collaborate with agents in teams - 2026-04

agent-generated artifact for human review -- video showing changes agent task -- change review app

see in context